Skip to main content

Some Thoughts on the Effect of Trump

I think this is pretty straightforward, as these are the typical agenda items to conservatives, items that are likely to change under Trump, considering Republican control of Congress, and now that some sensible things that would have been done by Democrats would be usurped, like deficit and infrastructure spending:

  1. Reduced regulation and oversight of finance, health care
  2. Reduced oversight of the business environment and monopoly control
  3. Reduced tax collection and oversight
  4. Increased spending for defense
  5. Reduced social welfare spending
  6. Reduced oversight and intervention in bias-related areas
  7. Pullback from climate agreements and initiatives

My general feeling is that the Republican regime will be good for business in the short-term, but bad for people in both the short and long term:

  • Stock market exuberance, but increased risk of market crashes and bubbles
  • Deficits, with corresponding cuts to social welfare to compensate
  • Increase in inflation, which can have positive effects on the economy
  • Higher costs for consumers, increases to inequality
  • Increased corporate control of media messages toward Republican sentiment
  • Increased discrimination, hate crime incidents
  • Increased mortality among African-Americans, Hispanics and women
  • Not just increased pollution, which will contribute to mortality and disease, but general savaging the environment
  • Increased likelihood of international incidents, instigating conflicts with Iran, the Middle East, and Latin America

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review - The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies

The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies by Scott E. Page My rating: 4 of 5 stars Generally, I found the book most engaging for understanding perception, heuristics and decision making, although this did not seem to be the primary premise of the book. As for the writing, it was a bit long-winded, using analogies to make points, even though the concepts themselves are readily accessible without elucidation. As to its purported focus, it provides academic, empirical, and statistical support for diversity, not necessarily racial or ethnic, with the premise being that diversity of viewpoint within groups is powerful, so much so that it trumps individual excellence. View all my reviews
Post a Comment
Read more

In Amazon Fight, Progressives Showed What They Want: A New Economic Agenda

In the end, the failure of this deal lays at the feet of Cuomo and De Blasio. It's a deal that should have never been made or should have been done in a way that wasn't filled with one-sided giveaways. As Amy Liu, vice president and director of the Metropolitan Policy Program at the Brookings Institution, describes, Virginia worked with local constituents to address concerns, negotiated a deal that required jobs from Amazon in exchange for incentives, and put more money into developing an education-focused job pipeline, rather than a simple giveaway to Amazon. Many people are going to blame a vocal minority for the failure when the problem was the deal itself. It could have been done to satisfy the critics, or at least mollify them, while still delivering for New York. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/16/business/amazon-economy-taxes.html?comments#permid=30664506
Post a Comment
Read more

Happy New Year! May Your City Never Become San Francisco, New York or Seattle - Responses

#1 I'm a long-time New York resident, have watched the real estate market for years, and wonder about the cause and effect of high prices. My sense is that developers develop for the high-end because that is where the profits are. Not justifying the inequality, but over time, the only place to make major profits has been to either reduce costs at a huge scale, e.g., Amazon and Walmart, or to focus on smaller opportunities but aimed at the affluent, e.g., the luxury retail sector. Yes, it is not that simple, since cost is affected by regulations and taxation, but on its face, the high costs of developing in Manhattan, and maybe anywhere in NYC, force developers to focus on the luxury segment. At one time, significant government investment and support in affordable housing made it profitable for developers to build for average incomes, but much of that has been wiped away, along with other supports for the middle class over the past few decades, driving much of our inequality, th...
Post a Comment
Read more