Skip to main content

Why Amazon Is Caught in an Unexpected Brawl in New York

#1

I was surprised that less affluent groups and minorities were for Amazon coming to NYC, although I was aware that locals in my area would be in favor. I live in Murray Hill, and it has a large number of software developers, in number and percentage, in Manhattan, and many - most? - people in our zip code earn in the six figures.

I've worked as a software developer for over 15 years, and have occasionally been contacted by Amazon for my skills, although I would not put too much on this as I am always being contacted by recruiters, much of worthless. Although I am likely to benefit from Amazon coming to NYC, I am not a fan of the deal in its current incarnation. It takes too much money from our coffers, circumvents city governance, will place a large burden on existing resources, and will drive up costs for many New York residents. It seems the biggest boosters would be the real estate industry, along with anyone that might be able to profit from selling to the behemoth...

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/12/nyregion/amazon-nyc-hq2.html?comments#permid=30601407

#2

@stuckincali - Do you know they will be getting jobs? At best, this is a notion, and Amazon is not obligated to deliver anything, nor is there any penalty if it does not deliver. Everything about this is exploitative, from taxes to the circumvention of local input, with a promise of jobs and support. Even then, if there are to be jobs, will that be greater than the costs incurred, the increase in rents, the displacement of locals?

https://nyti.ms/2V0DAzK#permid=30604967

#3

I recently attended a lecture at my employer, MSKCC, given by Annie Duke, about decisions, and the flaw in many is assuming the quality of a decision by its outcome. Considering Amazons' initial position, deals from the state and city, arranged to circumvent local decision-making, it might have looked like an easy choice. So what would a probabilistic solution look like?

I'll assume desirability is enough to make NYC a choice, as many/most major cities have similar problems with transportation. Making some assumptions, the deciding factors would be how well one could source adequate land, in a suitable location, at a manageable price, with support from politicians, with access to enough tech-savvy people, and support from locals. In this instance, the backlash of a sizeable minority of voters, skewing toward the liberal, educated and affluent.

In the end, one wonders if it was a bad decision by Amazon or one that had a low probability of occurrence, but occurred.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/14/business/amazon-new-york-city.html?comments#permid=30650011

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review - The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies

The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies by Scott E. Page My rating: 4 of 5 stars Generally, I found the book most engaging for understanding perception, heuristics and decision making, although this did not seem to be the primary premise of the book. As for the writing, it was a bit long-winded, using analogies to make points, even though the concepts themselves are readily accessible without elucidation. As to its purported focus, it provides academic, empirical, and statistical support for diversity, not necessarily racial or ethnic, with the premise being that diversity of viewpoint within groups is powerful, so much so that it trumps individual excellence. View all my reviews
Post a Comment
Read more

A Response to Twilight of the Polymaths (NY Times)

Since you are aware of the fox and hedgehog dichotomy, you might be aware of Tetlock’s book and long-term study showing how foxes best hedgehogs in political prediction, Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? Although depth in specialties has its merits, I can see how that depth also leads to a kind of blindness, a ‘man with a hammer’ problem, while polymaths, or people with broad awareness can sometimes pull together diverse facts to form insights that are not bound by one’s expertise. Along the same lines, many insights in technology don’t come so much from depth, but by ‘cross-pollination’ of ideas, of taking the basic concepts of one specialty and applying them to a peripherally-related one.
Post a Comment
Read more

How Much Will Americans Sacrifice for Good Health Care?

I'm am often reminded of a statement, paraphrased from Amartya Sen, that one person's equality is another man's inequality when discussing social welfare. Making the system work could mean increasing taxes on the wealthy, reducing the military expenditure, reducing payments for unproven medications, reducing the power of insurers, doctors, and medical/pharmaceutical companies. American wellbeing, on the whole, might improve substantially, but the flip side is that all of those impinged upon would take umbrage as if their freedom was reduced. In the end, we have to realize there is a greater good to human welfare and life, and that the interests of the powerful matter less. Even then, if we tried, expect lawsuits and smears, accusations of socialism and tyranny... https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/16/opinion/sunday/medicare-for-all-universal-health-care.html?comments#permid=30660804
Post a Comment
Read more